Promoting childbirth companions in South Africa: a randomised pilot study
Open Access
- 30 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 5 (1) , 7
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-5-7
Abstract
Most women delivering in South African State Maternity Hospitals do not have a childbirth companion; in addition, the quality of care could be better, and at times women are treated inhumanely. We piloted a multi-faceted intervention to encourage uptake of childbirth companions in state hospitals, and hypothesised that lay carers would improve the behaviour of health professionals. We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote childbirth companions in hospital deliveries. We promoted evidence-based information for maternity staff at 10 hospitals through access to the World Health Organization Reproductive Health Library (RHL), computer hardware and training to all ten hospitals. We surveyed 200 women at each site, measuring companionship, and indicators of good obstetric practice and humanity of care. Five hospitals were then randomly allocated to receive an educational intervention to promote childbirth companions, and we surveyed all hospitals again at eight months through a repeat survey of postnatal women. Changes in median values between intervention and control hospitals were examined. At baseline, the majority of hospitals did not allow a companion, or access to food or fluids. A third of women were given an episiotomy. Some women were shouted at (17.7%, N = 2085), and a few reported being slapped or struck (4.3%, N = 2080). Despite an initial positive response from staff to the childbirth companion intervention, we detected no difference between intervention and control hospitals in relation to whether a companion was allowed by nursing staff, good obstetric practice or humanity of care. The quality and humanity of care in these state hospitals needs to improve. Introducing childbirth companions was more difficult than we anticipated, particularly in under-resourced health care systems with frequent staff changes. We were unable to determine whether the presence of a lay carer impacted on the humanity of care provided by health professionals. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33728802Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Getting evidence into practice: what works in developing countries?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2005
- Putting evidence into practice: how middle and low income countries “get it together”BMJ, 2004
- Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesiaPublished by Wiley ,2004
- From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' careThe Lancet, 2003
- Continuous support for women during childbirthPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Better Births Initiative in South AfricaBritish Journal of Midwifery, 2003
- Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at termPublished by Wiley ,2001
- Episiotomy for vaginal birthPublished by Wiley ,1999
- Lack of Effect of Walking on Labor and DeliveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- External cephalic version for breech presentation at termPublished by Wiley ,1996