Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 354 (9193) , 1896-1900
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigatedBMJ, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Identification of meta-analysesControlled Clinical Trials, 1990
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987