Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Defibrillators
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 9 (3) , 261-268
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00911.x
Abstract
Enhanced Tachycardia Detection Algorithm introduction: Enhanced detection criteria in third‐generation implantable defibrillators have been implemented to avoid inappropriate therapy of fast supraventricular arrhythmias. We prospectively analyzed the use of these criteria in patients with an implantable defibrillator with electrogram storing capability. Methods and Results: In 82 consecutive patients with a Guidant‐CPI implantable defibrillator, sudden onset > 9% and stability < 40 msec were systematically programmed in zone 1 of therapy together with a sustained rate duration security mechanism. All detected tachycardia episodes were analyzed. The study population consisted of 59 patients who had at least one episode of tachycardia detected in zone 1 during follow‐up. The tachycardia rate in zone 1 never exceeded 210 beats/min. Twenty patients had no episodes during follow‐up, and three patients had episodes detected exclusively in zone 2 of therapy. Supraventricular arrhythmias were detected frequently in the ventricular tachycardia zone (193 of 690 tachycardia episodes in 23 of 59 patients). Use of sudden onset was very effective in detecting sinus tachycardias (65 of 67 episodes), and stability was very useful in detecting atrial fibrillation (31 of 32 episodes). However, sensitivity in detecting ventricular tachycardia was only 90% (451 of 497 episodes). Application of the sustained rate duration criterion allowed appropriate treatment of all ventricular tachycardia episodes, increasing sensitivity to 100%; however, specificity in appropriate non‐treatment of supraventricular decreased from 96% to 83%. Subsequent analysis of different algorithms applied to our data showed that sudden onset > 9% and stability < 40 msec was the algorithm with the best specificity and sensitivity. Conclusion: Programming sudden onset and stability detection criteria with a sustained rate duration safety net for triggering tachycardia therapy results in appropriate device management in most patients with supraventricular and slow (< 210 beats/min) ventricular tachycardias.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stability: An ICD Detection Criterion for Discriminating Atrial Fibrillation From Ventricular TachycardiaJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1995
- Programmable VT Detection Enhancements in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator TherapyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995
- Underdetection of ventricular tachycardia by algorithms to enhance specificity in a tiered-therapy cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Discrimination of ventricular tachycardia from sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation in a tiered-therapy cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implanted Pacing Cardioverter DefibrillatorsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1994
- Clinical experience with antitachycardia pacing and improved detection algorithms in a new implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Electrocardiographically Documented Unnecessary, Spontaneous Shocks in 241 Patients With Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Arrhythmias induced by device antitachycardia therapy due to diagnostic nonspecificityJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Changes in cycle length at the onset of sustained tachycardias—importance for antitachycardiac pacingAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Erroneous discharge from an implanted automatic defibrillator during supraventricular tachyarrhythmia induced ventricular fibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986