EQUATING ACHIEVEMENT TESTS USING SAMPLES MATCHED ON ABILITY
Open Access
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in ETS Research Report Series
- Vol. 1990 (1)
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1990.tb01351.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparative Study of the Effects of Recency of Instruction on the Stability of IRT and Conventional Item Parameter EstimatesJournal of Educational Measurement, 1988
- Technical and Practical Issues in Equating: A Discussion of Four PapersApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- The Use of Presnloothing and Postsnloothing to Increase the Precision of Equipercentile EquatingApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Smoothing the joint and marginal distributions of scored two‐way contingency tables in test equatingBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1987
- IRT versus Conventional Equating Methods: A Comparative Study of Scale StabilityJournal of Educational Statistics, 1983
- Automated Hypothesis Tests and Standard Errors for Nonstandard ProblemsThe American Statistician, 1975
- EQUATING THE SCORE SCALES OF ALTERNATE FORMS ADMINISTERED TO SAMPLES OF DIFFERENT ABILITYETS Research Bulletin Series, 1955