Differences in Our Sensory Worlds
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Vol. 14 (3) , 122-125
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00346.x
Abstract
People use intensity descriptors to compare sensory differences: “This tastes strong to me; is it strong to you?” These comparisons are deceptive because they assume that intensity descriptors like strong denote the same absolute perceived intensities to everyone. This assumption is false. Visual-analogue and category scales are labeled with intensity descriptors, and whenever there are systematic differences across groups in the absolute perceived intensity denoted by these descriptors, across-group comparisons will be invalid. We have explored this problem using studies of taste perception. When intensity descriptors are falsely assumed to have universal meaning, real differences can be blunted, abolished, or reversed. One solution to this problem is to express sensations of interest relative to an unrelated standard; any variation in this standard will be equivalent across groups, allowing valid group comparisons. The importance of detecting and correcting these measurement errors is not limited to sensory comparisons, but applies to hedonic comparisons as well.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychophysical Measurement of Human Taste ExperiencePublished by Springer Nature ,2006
- From psychophysics to the clinic: missteps and advancesFood Quality and Preference, 2004
- Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in tasteFood Quality and Preference, 2003
- New Psychophysical Insights in Evaluating Genetic Variation in TastePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2002
- Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and menPhysiology & Behavior, 2000
- How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design.Psychological Methods, 1999
- Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio propertiesChemical Senses, 1993
- Magnitude-matching: the measurement of taste and smellChemical Senses, 1988
- How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utilityTheory and Decision, 1983