Women’s Anxieties Caused by False Positives in Mammography Screening: A Contingent Valuation Survey
- 4 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 101 (1) , 59-64
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9270-4
Abstract
Breast cancer screening with mammography has been shown to be effective for preventing breast cancer death. However, mammography screening can be harmful to women. One of the major problems is anxiety from a false positive result. Previous studies do not consider intangible benefits related to anxiety or peace of mind in mammography screening. In order to quantify anxiety, we employed the contingent valuation method (CVM) to measure the␣general public’s willingness to pay (WTP) for mammography screening. About 397 women aged 50–59 participated in the computer-assisted questionnaire survey. For the WTP question format, the double-bound dichotomous choice approach was employed. Participants were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Group A (n = 200) was provided with information about the procedure, detection rate and mortality reduction of mammography screening. Group B (n = 197) was provided with additional information including possibility of false positives and the risks of close examinations. The mean WTP was significantly greater in Group A than in Group B ($16.82 vs. $12.89, P = 0.02). A Weibull regression analysis showed that, type of information, history of receiving mammography screening, family history of cancer, and the degree of concern about health were significant factors affecting WTP. Women must be well informed before making decisions about mammography screening. Although anxiety from information about false positives significantly decreased the women’s benefit, the amount of WTP in the well-informed group was still considerable. The results suggest that women can balance the anxiety against the effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stated preferences for the removal of physical pain resulting from permanently disabling occupational injuriesAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2005
- Willingness to pay for avoiding coronary restenosis and repeat revascularization: results from a contingent valuation studyHealth Policy, 2004
- Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care:a critical assessmentHealth Economics, 2002
- Patient Expectations and Costs of Immediate Reporting of Screening MammographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Valuing the benefits of mobile mammographic screening units using the contingent valuation methodApplied Economics, 2000
- Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?The Lancet, 2000
- When Do the "Dollars" Make Sense?Medical Decision Making, 1996
- Willingness to pay for antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosisHealth Economics, 1995
- A Non-Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation StudiesLand Economics, 1990
- What Do Patients Value?Medical Care, 1985