Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 57 (675) , 205-207
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-57-675-205
Abstract
A comparison was made of the incidence of venous thrombophlebitis resulting from the use of a high-osmolality contrast medium (Conray 60%, meglumine iothalamate), and a low-osmolality contrast medium (Niopam 61%, iopamidol). In 20 patients Conray was injected into one leg and Niopam into the other. The incidence of thrombophlebitis was then determined using the 125I fibrinogen uptake test in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. There was significantly less thrombophlebitis with Niopam than with Conray and it is concluded that Niopam is a safer contrast medium for phlebography.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: meglumine loxaglate versus meglumine lothalamate.Radiology, 1983
- A Double-Blind Comparative Study of the Tolerance of Sodium and Meglumine Ioxaglate (Hexabrix) with Meglumine Iothalamate (Conray) in Ascending Phlebography of the LegAustralasian Radiology, 1982
- 125I-fibrinogen uptake following phlebography of the leg. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology, 1980
- Complications of ascending phlebography of the leg.BMJ, 1978
- Leg Phlebography: The Incidence, Nature and Modification of Undesirable Side EffectsRadiology, 1977
- THROMBOTIC SIDE-EFFECTS OF LOWER-LIMB PHLEBOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1976
- PhlebographyArchives of Surgery, 1972
- Simplified phlebography in deep venous thrombosisClinical Radiology, 1971
- THROMBOSIS AS A COMPLICATION OF VENOGRAPHYPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1942