The susceptibility of a cereal aphid pest and its natural enemies to Deltamethrin
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pesticide Science
- Vol. 36 (3) , 263-272
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780360313
Abstract
The intrinsic toxicity of deltamethrin to the grain aphid Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and a range of its important natural enemies was determined by laboratory topical bioassay. The natural enemies included polyphagous predators such as Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger), Harpalus rufipes (Degeer), Nebria brevicollis (F.), Agonum dorsale (Pont.), Demetrias atricapillus (L.), Trechus quadristriatus (Schrank), Bembidion obtusum (Serville), and B. lampros (Herbst.) (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Tachyporus hypnorum (F.) (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and Erigone atra (Blackwall) (Araneae: Linyphiidae), as well as the aphid‐specific ladybird Coccinella septempunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Dose–response relationships were compared between species by probit analysis and maximum likelihood procedures to determine trends of susceptibility, measured in terms of ng a.i. arthropod−1 and μg a.i. g−1 body weight. The range of LD50 values varied between 0.8 and 232 ng arthropod−1 and 0.76 and 66.17 μg g−1 body weight for the species tested. The linyphiid spider E. atra (♀) was the most intrinsically susceptible species and had the narrowest tolerance distribution of the predators tested, whereas the small carabid beetle D. atricapillus was the least intrinsically susceptible predator species. There were significant differences in susceptibility between species of different orders, i.e. the Araneae, Hemiptera and Coleoptera. Differences within the Coleoptera were closely related to body weight, with the exception of the carabid beetle D. atricapillus, which seemed to be tolerant to deltamethrin. Knockdown time studies indicated that D. atricapillus had a higher survival rate after being knocked down than other species of predator. Aphid susceptibility per unit body weight was not significantly different from that of the predators. The aphid did, however, demonstrate a broader tolerance distribution than most of the predators, which may be related to its herbivorous nature. The use of laboratory susceptibility data to determine selectivity and to predict pesticide hazard is discussed.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tactics for Managing Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods: Theory and PracticeAnnual Review of Entomology, 1992
- The kinetics of insecticide action. Part IV: the in‐vivo distribution of pyrethroid insecticides during insect poisoningPesticide Science, 1990
- Characteristics of pyrethroids for insect pest control in agriculturePesticide Science, 1989
- Designing resistance management programs: How can you choose?Pesticide Science, 1989
- Integrating use of beneficial organisms with chemical crop protectionPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1988
- The potential for managing indigenous natural enemies of aphids on field cropsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1988
- Control of cereal aphids in winter wheat by natural enemies: aphid‐specific predators, parasitoids and pathogenic fungiAnnals of Applied Biology, 1986
- Studies on the effect of deltamethrin sprays on the numbers of epigeal predatory arthropods occurring in arable fieldsPesticide Science, 1985
- The distribution and abundance of predatory Coleoptera overwintering in field boundariesAnnals of Applied Biology, 1985
- The role of ground beetles (Carabidae) as predators on early populations of cereal aphids in spring barleyZeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 1984