The reliability of virtual organ computer‐aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion
- 10 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 22 (6) , 633-639
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.923
Abstract
Objectives Three‐dimensional power Doppler angiography (3D‐PDA) has been largely used for the subjective assessment of vascular patterns but semiquantification of the power Doppler signal is now possible. We examined the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial blood flow using 3D‐PDA, virtual organ computer‐aided analysis (VOCAL™) and shell‐imaging. Methods 3D‐PDA was used to acquire 20 ovarian and 20 endometrial volumes from 40 different patients at various stages of in vitro fertilization treatment. VOCAL was then used to delineate the 3D areas of interest and the ‘histogram facility’ employed to generate three indices of vascularity: the vascular index, the flow index and the vascularization flow index. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was assessed by two‐way, mixed, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and general linear modeling was used to examine for differences in the mean values between each observer. Results The intraobserver reliability for both observers was extremely high and there were no differences in reliability between the observers for measurements of both volume and vascularity within the ovary or endometrium and its shells. With the exception of the outside subendometrial shell volumes, there were no significant differences between the two observers in the mean values obtained for either endometrial or ovarian volume and vascularity measurements. The interobserver reliability of measurements was equally high throughout with all measurements obtaining a mean ICC of above 0.985. Conclusions 3D‐PDA and shell‐imaging offer a reliable, practical and non‐invasive method for the assessment of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial blood flow. Future work should concentrate upon confirming the reliability of data acquisition and the validity of the technique before its predictive value can be truly tested in prospective clinical studies. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The interobserver reliability and validity of volume calculation from three‐dimensional ultrasound datasets in the in vitro settingUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Intraobserver and interobserver variability of ovarian volume, gray‐scale and color flow indices obtained using transvaginal three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasonographyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- The reproducibility of endometrial volume acquisition and measurement with the VOCAL‐imaging programUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Reproducibility of transvaginal three‐dimensional endometrial volume measurements with virtual organ computer‐aided analysis (VOCAL) during ovarian stimulationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Introduction to the DICOM standardEuropean Radiology, 2001
- The reliability and validity of three dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements using an in vitro balloon and in vivo uterine modelBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Placing value on pictures: what information is there in color flow images and how can we use it?Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Three‐dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularizationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Ultrasonic Doppler and Duplex Systems: Possibilities and LimitationsUrologia Internationalis, 1990
- The Doppler signal: where does it come from and what does it mean?American Journal of Roentgenology, 1988