Relationship between a Forward Learning Set and Three Orders of Multiple-Choice Examinations
- 1 June 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 34 (3) , 727-733
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1974.34.3.727
Abstract
A series of 4 replication-design experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship of arrangement of test-items and its effects on S's performance for teacher-devised examinations. A 30-item, four-choice, multiple-choice examination was prepared by the teacher and presented in three forms. The Forward-Backward form, presented test items covering material from the first lecture through the last; the Backward-Forward form, presented the same items in reverse order; and the third form had a random order of items. For Exp. I the above procedure was administered to 105 college students enrolled in a course on behavior modification. Replications used the same procedure with 20, 20, and 21 students respectively. Results of all studies were nonsignificant; experimental outcomes were varied and totally different.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- TEST ITEM ARRANGEMENT, TESTING TIME, AND PERFORMANCEJournal of Educational Measurement, 1970
- THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS FORMS OF ITEM ARRANGEMENTS ON TEST PERORMANCEJournal of Educational Measurement, 1966
- Test difficulty, reliability, and discrimination as functions of item difficulty order.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1964
- Item scrambling in a self-instructional program.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963
- A Comparison of Branching Methods for Programmed LearningThe Journal of Educational Research, 1962
- Scrambled versus ordered sequence in autoinstructional programs.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962
- The Effects of a Forward-Retention Set on an Objective Achievment Test Presented Forward or BackwardsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1954
- The relation of 'set' to retention.Psychological Review, 1948