Risk Profiles and Treatment Patterns Among Men Diagnosed as Having Prostate Cancer and a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level Below 4.0 ng/mL
- 26 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 170 (14) , 1256-1261
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.221
Abstract
Background: Despite controversy over the benefit of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, little is known about risk profiles and treatment patterns in men diagnosed as having prostate cancer who have a PSA value less than or equal to 4.0 ng/mL. Methods: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results system to describe patient characteristics and treatment patterns in the cases of 123 934 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2004 to 2006. Age-standardized treatment rates were calculated in 5-year age strata. Logistic regression was used to quantify the odds ratios (ORs) of men with low-and high-risk disease and the use of radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Results: Men with a PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or lower represent 14% of incident prostate cancer cases. Fifty-four percent of men diagnosed as having prostate cancer and PSA levels lower than 4.0 ng/mL harbor low-risk disease (stage, <= T2a, PSA level, <= 10 ng/mL, and Gleason score, <= 6), but over 75% of them received RP or RT. Men with screen-detected prostate cancer and PSA values lower than 4 ng/mL were 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-1.62) and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.30-1.49) times more likely to receive RP and RT, respectively, and were less likely to have high-grade disease than men who had non-screen-detected prostate cancer (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.76). Conclusions: Most men diagnosed as having prostate cancer with a PSA threshold below 4.0 ng/mL had low-risk disease but underwent aggressive local therapy. Lowering the biopsy threshold but retaining our inability to distinguish indolent from aggressive cancers might increase the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health-Related Quality of Life 2 Years After Treatment With Radical Prostatectomy, Prostate Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate CancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2008
- Radical Prostatectomy Versus Watchful Waiting in Localized Prostate Cancer: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 Randomized TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Survival Associated With Treatment vs Observation of Localized Prostate Cancer in Elderly MenJAMA, 2006
- Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in the United States: Implications of Various Definitions for AbnormalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INITIAL PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVEL AND SUBSEQUENT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN A LONGITUDINAL SCREENING STUDYJournal of Urology, 2004
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful WaitingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen eraCancer, 2002
- Overdiagnosis Due to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Lessons From U.S. Prostate Cancer Incidence TrendsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Health-Related Quality-of-Life Effects of Radical Prostatectomy and Primary Radiotherapy for Screen-Detected or Clinically Diagnosed Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001