Comparative Susceptibilities to Fidaxomicin (OPT-80) of Isolates Collected at Baseline, Recurrence, and Failure from Patients in Two Phase III Trials of Fidaxomicin against Clostridium difficile Infection
Open Access
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 55 (11) , 5194-5199
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00625-11
Abstract
A 10-day course of oral fidaxomicin (200 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]), a potent new macrocyclic drug, was compared to vancomycin (125 mg four times a day [q.i.d.]) in 1,164 adults (1,105 in the modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population) with Clostridium difficile infection in two phase III randomized, double-blind trials at sites in North America and 7 European countries. Of 1,105 mITT patients, 792 (71.7%), including 719/999 (72.0%) in the per-protocol (PP) population, provided a C. difficile strain at baseline, of whom 356 received fidaxomicin with 330 cures (92.7%) and 363 received vancomycin with 329 cures (90.6%). The susceptibilities (MIC90) of baseline isolates did not predict clinical cure, failure, or recurrence for fidaxomicin (MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml for both; range, ≤0.007 to 1 μg/ml), but there was a one-dilution difference in the MIC90 (but not the MIC50) for vancomycin (MIC90, 2 μg/ml [range, 0.25 to 8 μg/ml] for cure and 4.0 μg/ml [range, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml] for failures). A total of 65 (7.9%) “rifaximin-resistant” (MIC > 256 μg/ml) strains were isolated in both treatment groups on enrollment, which increased to 25% for failures at the end of therapy. No resistance to either fidaxomicin or vancomycin developed during treatment in either of the phase III studies, although a single strain isolated from a cured patient had an elevated fidaxomicin MIC of 16 μg/ml at the time of recurrence. All isolates were susceptible to ≤4 μg/ml of metronidazole. When analyzed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) type, 247/719 (34.4%) isolates were BI group isolates, and the MICs were generally higher for all four drugs tested (MIC90s: fidaxomicin, 0.5; vancomycin, 2.0; metronidazole, 2.0; and rifaximin, >256 μg/ml) than for the other REA types. There was no correlation between the MIC of a baseline clinical isolate and clinical outcome. MIC90s were generally low for fidaxomicin and vancomycin, but BI isolates had higher MICs than other REA group isolates.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Changing Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile InfectionsClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2010
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults: 2010 Update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2010
- Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridium difficileInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2009
- High Frequency of Rifampin Resistance Identified in an EpidemicClostridium difficileClone from a Large Teaching HospitalClinical Infectious Diseases, 2009
- In Vitro Activity of OPT-80 Tested against Clinical Isolates of Toxin-Producing Clostridium difficileAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2008
- Metronidazole Resistance in Clostridium difficile Is HeterogeneousJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- In Vitro Activities of 15 Antimicrobial Agents against 110 Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Clinical Isolates Collected from 1983 to 2004Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- A Comparison of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea, Stratified by Disease SeverityClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Interruption of Recurrent Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea Episodes by Serial Therapy with Vancomycin and RifaximinClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- In Vitro Activity of OPT-80 against Clostridium difficileAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2004