Resolving questions about bias in real and hypothetical referenda
- 12 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental and Resource Economics
- Vol. 38 (4) , 513-525
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9095-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference ValuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 2005
- Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003
- A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendumJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003
- Induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanismEconomics Letters, 2001
- What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001
- Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation MethodAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Of Birds and Books: More on Hypothetical ReferendaJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?Journal of Political Economy, 1997
- A Learning Design for Reducing Hypothetical Bias in the Contingent Valuation MethodEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 1997
- The Reliability of Dichotomous Judgments: Unequal Numbers of Judges per SubjectApplied Psychological Measurement, 1979