Planning and Implementing a Reintroduction of Wolves to Yellowstone National Park and Central Idaho
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Restoration Ecology
- Vol. 5 (1) , 7-27
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.1997.09702.x
Abstract
The Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery plan proposed reintroduction ofCanis lupus(gray wolf) to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho as part of a wolf restoration plan for the northern Rocky Mountains of the United States. Strong opposition from some factions within the region forestalled the action for two decades. An environmental impact statement, conducted in 1992–1994 with extensive public input, culminated in a proposal to reintroduce wolves designated as “non‐essential—experimental” under Section 10 (j) of the federal Endangered Species Act. This approach, approved by the Secretary of the Interior in 1994, provided for wolf restoration while allowing management flexibility to deal with concerns of the local public. A reintroduction plan was developed in the summer and fall of 1994. Acquiring, holding, transporting, and releasing suitable wolves for reintroduction presented a myriad of technical and logistical challenges that required effective planning and coordination by all participants. In January 1995, 29 wolves were captured in Alberta and transported to Yellowstone National Park (14) and central Idaho (15). Idaho wolves were freed immediately upon arrival; Yellowstone wolves (three family groups) were held in acclimation pens in the park until late March. Most Idaho wolves traveled extensively within the area intended for them, averaging 82 km net distance away from release sites after 5 months (range = 30–220 km), and three male‐female pairs formed by July. After 5 months in the wild, at least 13 of 15 Idaho‐released wolves were alive within the intended area, as were 13 of 14 Yellowstone wolves; one wolf was known to have been illegally killed in each area. No livestock were killed. Wolves released into Yellowstone Park continued to live as packs, stayed closer to their release sites (x = 22 km at end of June), and settled into home ranges; two packs produced a total of nine pups. The progress of the reintroduction program in its first year far exceeded expectations. Reintroductions of about 15 wolves to each area for 2–4 more years are scheduled, but the project may be shortened because of early successes. Future reintroduction planners can expect sociocultural issues to pervade the effort, but they can be optimistic that, from a biological standpoint, reintroduction of wolves has strong potential as a restoration technique.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population Viability, Nature Reserves, and the Outlook for Gray Wolf Conservation in North AmericaRestoration Ecology, 1995
- The swift fox reintroduction program in Canada from 1983 to 1992Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- The relationship of wolf recovery to habitat conservation and biodiversity in the northwestern United StatesLandscape and Urban Planning, 1994
- Dispersal of wolves (Canis lupus) in northeastern Minnesota, 1969–1989Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1991
- Immobilization of Gray Wolves with a Combination of Tiletamine Hydrochloride and Zolazepam HydrochlorideThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1991
- Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and StrategyScience, 1989
- First Wolf Den in Western U.S. in Recent HistoryNorthwestern Naturalist, 1989
- Movements of Translocated Wolves in MinnesotaThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1984
- Scent-marking in lone wolves and newly formed pairsAnimal Behaviour, 1979
- Some Methods for Capturing Coyotes AliveThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1968