Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 27 February 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 67 (7) , 745-753
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to considerTrials, 2012
- Standards of Outcome Reporting in Surgical Oncology: A Case Study in Esophageal CancerAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2012
- Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core OutcomesJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2012
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key IssuesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The Impact Triad (Severity, Importance, Self-management) as a Method of Enhancing Measurement of Personal Life Impact of Rheumatic DiseasesThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2011
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkersEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2008
- Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force ReportValue in Health, 2005