Rectal cancer treatment and outcome in the elderly: an audit based on the Swedish rectal cancer registry 1995–2004
Open Access
- 26 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cancer
- Vol. 9 (1) , 68
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-68
Abstract
Limited information is available regarding the effect of age on choice of surgical and oncological treatment for rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of age on treatment and outcome of rectal cancer. We utilized data in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry (SRCR) from patients treated for rectal cancer in Sweden in 1995–2004. A total of 15,104 patients with rectal cancer were identified, 42.4% of whom were 75 years or older. Patients ≥75 years were less likely to have distant metastases than younger patients (14.8% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001), and underwent abdominal tumor resection less frequently (68.5% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001). Of 11,725 patients with abdominal tumor resection (anterior resection [AR], abdominoperineal excision [APE], and Hartmann's procedure [HA]), 37.4% were ≥75 years. Curative surgery was registered for 85.0% of patients ≥ 75 years and for 83.9% of patients < 75 years, P = 0.11. Choice of abdominal operation differed significantly between the two age groups for both curative and non-curative surgery, The frequency of APE was similar in both age groups (29.5% vs. 28.6%), but patients ≥75 years were more likely to have HA (16.9% vs. 4.9%) and less likely to have preoperative radiotherapy (34.3vs. 67.2%, P < 0.001). The relative survival rate at five years for all patients treated with curative intent was 73% (70–75%) for patients ≥75 years and 78% (77–79%) for patients < 75 years of age. Local recurrence rate was 9% (8–11%) for older and 8% (7–9%) for younger patients. Treatment of rectal cancer is influenced by patient's age. Future studies should include younger and older patients alike to reveal whether or not age-related differences are purposive. Local recurrence following surgery for low tumors and quality of life aspects deserve particular attention.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Outcome After Operative Intervention for Rectal Cancer in Patients Aged Over 80 Years: Analysis of 9,501 PatientsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2007
- Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: A population-based studyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2006
- Nationwide quality assurance of rectal cancer treatmentColorectal Disease, 2006
- Co-morbidity leads to altered treatment and worse survival of elderly patients with colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in StockholmBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Rectal Cancer in the Elderly: Patients' Perception of Bowel Control After Restorative SurgeryDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2004
- Improved survival in patients with rectal cancer: a population-based register studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Survival of colorectal carcinoma in the elderlyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1997
- Postoperative mortality in rectal cancer treated with or without preoperative radiotherapy: Causes and risk factorsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- A computer program package for relative survival analysisComputer Programs in Biomedicine, 1985