Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study
- 28 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Vol. 37 (1) , 19-24
- https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.1998.0423
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dentofacial changes in Norwegian and lowan populations between 6 and 18 years of ageEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1995
- Longitudinal cephalometric standards for Norwegians between the ages of 6 and 18 yearsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1994
- A Six-Center International Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Clefts of the Lip and Palate: Part 1. Principles and Study DesignThe Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 1992
- A Six-Center International Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Clefts of the Lip and Palate: Part 2. Craniofacial Form and Soft Tissue ProfileThe Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 1992
- Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric studyEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1992
- Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1990
- A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by Function Regulators (FR-2 and FR-3)European Journal of Orthodontics, 1989
- Treatment effects of the Herbst applianceAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1989
- A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurementEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1985
- A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1984