Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
Open Access
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 5 (3) , 298-311
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040497
Abstract
The relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony (MP) and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct tree (topology) were studied by using computer simulation. The distance-matrix methods examined are the neighbor-joining, distance-Wagner, Tateno et al. modified Farris, Faith, and Li methods. In the computer simulation, six or eight DNA sequences were assumed to evolve following a given model tree, and the evolutionary changes of the sequences were followed. Both constant and varying rates of nucleotide substitution were considered. From the sequences thus obtained, phylogenetic trees were constructed using the six tree-making methods and compared with the model (true) tree. This process was repeated 300 times for each different set of parameters. The results obtained indicate that when the number of nucleotide substitutions per site is small and a relatively small number of nucleotides are used, the probability of obtaining the correct topology (P1) is generally lower in the MP method than in the distance-matrix methods. The P1 value for the MP method increases with increasing number of nucleotides but is still generally lower than the value for the NJ or DW method. Essentially the same conclusion was obtained whether or not the rate of nucleotide substitution was constant or whether or not a transition bias in nucleotide substitution existed. The relatively poor performance of the MP method for these cases is due to the fact that information from singular sites is not used in this method. The MP method also showed a relatively low P1 value when the model of varying rate of nucleotide substitution was used and the number of substitutions per site was large. However, the MP method often produced cases in which the correct tree was one of several equally parsimonious trees. When these cases were included in the class of "success," the MP method performed better than the other methods, provided that the number of nucleotide substitutions per site was small.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1987
- The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species, with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergenceJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1986
- Distance Methods and the Approximation of Most-Parsimonious TreesSystematic Zoology, 1985
- Towards a basis for classification: the incompleteness of distance measures, incompatibility analysis and phenetic classificationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- A practical method for calculating evolutionary trees from sequence dataJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1981
- Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1981
- Comparison of phylogenetic treesMathematical Biosciences, 1981
- On the Problem of Discovering the Most Parsimonious TreeThe American Naturalist, 1977
- Construction of Phylogenetic TreesScience, 1967