Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• Reliability and credibility of an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing using recent graduates as judges
  Medical Education, 1999
• Relations Between Observed Item Difficulty Levels and Angoff Minimum Passing Levels for a Group of Borderline Examinees
  Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
• Teachers' Ability to Estimate Item Difficulty: A Test of the Assumptions in the Angoff Standard Setting Method
  Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
• Relative or Absolute Standards in Assessing Medical Knowledge Using Progress Tests
  Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1998
• The Credibility and Comparability of Standards
  Applied Measurement in Education, 1997
• Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum
  Medical Teacher, 1996
• Research on Standards for Professional Licensure and Certification Examinations
  Evaluation & the Health Professions, 1994
• Generalizability theory.
  American Psychologist, 1989
• A Comparative Study of Standard-Setting Methods
  Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
• The Effect of Various Factors on Standard Setting
  Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988