Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction*
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Decision Sciences
- Vol. 20 (3) , 419-434
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01558.x
Abstract
User information satisfaction (UIS) is important because of its potential effects on MIS department goals, quality of user work life, and extent of voluntary usage of systems. Reliable measurement of UIS is important for providing evaluative information for both researchers and practitioners. This study used 92 managers and executives as subjects to compare the test/retest reliability of a widely used, 13‐scale UIS instrument together with four summary questions under experimental and control conditions. The summary questions behaved more reliably than the detailed questions for all groups, perhaps because of problems with scale units and origins and with item heterogeneity. This suggests that researchers need more reliable measures of UIS and that practitioners need to exercise caution when collecting and interpreting UIS scores.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- What makes users happy?Communications of the ACM, 1986
- An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfactionCommunications of the ACM, 1986
- Rituals in Information System DesignMIS Quarterly, 1984
- The measurement of user information satisfactionCommunications of the ACM, 1983
- JOB SATISFACTION: ARE ALL THE PARTS THERE?Personnel Psychology, 1983
- Emotional Conservatism: The Basis of Social Behavior?Contemporary Psychology, 1980
- PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION: A PSYCHOMETRIC EXAMINATION*Decision Sciences, 1980
- Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Attitudes and OpinionsAnnual Review of Psychology, 1972
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959