No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (8) , 748-754
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA StatementPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic ReviewsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Reporting of the Role of the Expert Searcher in Cochrane ReviewsEvidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2006
- Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effectsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006
- Meta-review of high-quality systematic reviews of interventions in key areas of liaison psychiatryThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2005
- Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical surveyBMJ, 2004
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementThe Lancet, 1999