Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 62 (1) , 47-53.e3
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mega-trials vs. meta-analysis: Precision vs. heterogeneity?Contemporary Clinical Trials, 2007
- Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical ResearchJAMA, 2005
- Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Randomized Trials for Mental Health-Related InterventionsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Radiologic Diagnosis of Brain DeathPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2002
- Uses and abuses of meta-analysisClinical Medicine, 2001
- Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequencesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Comparing Results From Meta-analyses vs Large TrialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996