Sample size estimation for comparing two or more treatment groups in clinical trials
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 10 (1) , 33-43
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100109
Abstract
Methods for estimating required sample size for comparing two population means have been published. Most involve the use of complicated formulae and tables. These methods are limited to comparing two groups. Although techniques exist to determine sample sizes for comparing more than two groups, they are intrinsically far more complicated. A simple linear nomogram is proposed as a solution to these problems, and its use is illustrated with examples of parallel group, ordered parallel group and factorial designs.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sample size and power for comparing two or more treatment groups in clinical trials.BMJ, 1989
- Factorial designs in clinical trials: The effects of non‐compliance and subadditivityStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- GLYCOPYRRONIUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTAGONISM OF THE MUSCARINIC SIDE EFFECTS OF EDROPHONIUM †British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1989
- A randomised dose ranging study of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarctionBMJ, 1988
- Sample size requirements: one-way analysis of varianceBiometrika, 1970
- Normalizing the Noncentral $t$ and $F$ DistributionsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1960
- Charts of the Power of the $f$-TestThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1956
- CHARTS OF THE POWER FUNCTION FOR ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TESTS, DERIVED FROM THE NON-CENTRAL F-DISTRIBUTIONBiometrika, 1951
- Inverse Tables of Probabilities of Errors of the Second KindThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1944