Automatic Optimization of Resting and Exercise Atrioventricular Interval Using a Peak Endocardial Acceleration Sensor: Validation with Doppler Echocardiography and Direct Cardiac Output Measurements
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 23 (11P2) , 1762-1766
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07014.x
Abstract
Peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) measured by an implantable acceleration sensor inside the tip of a pacing lead reflects ventricular filling and myocardial contractility. The contribution of the plateau phase of PEA as an indicator of optimal ventricular filling, hence of the appropriate atrioventricular interval (AVI) at rest and during exercise, was studied in 12 patients (age 69 ± 6 years) with complete AV block and a PEA sensing DDDR pacemakers (Living 1 Plus, Sorin Biomedica). At a mean resting heart rate of 79 ± 15 beats/min, the mean AVI optimized by PEA versus Doppler echocardiography (echo) were identical (142 ± 37 vs 146 ± 26 ms, P = 0.59). During submaximal exercise at a mean heart rate of 134 ± 6 beats/min, AVI optimized by PEA was 135 ± 37 ms. Cardiac output at rest, measured by the CO2 rebreathing method, was comparable with AVI determined by echo versus PEA (4.3 ± 2.9 and 3.7 ± 2.4 L/min, respectively), and increased to the same extent (8.0 ± 3.9 vs 8.3 ± 5.2 L/min) during sub‐maximal exercise. In patients with AV block, AVI automatically set by PEA was comparable with AVI manually optimized by Doppler echocardiography and was associated with comparable exercise induced hemodynamic changes.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Output Is a Sensitive Indicator of Difference in Exercise Performance Between Single and Dual Sensor PacemakersPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998
- An Implantable Intracardiac Accelerometer for Monitoring Myocardial ContractilityPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1996
- Is Local Myocardial Contractility Related to Endocardial Acceleration Signals Detected by a Transvenous Pacing Lead?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1996
- C‐AMP and ANP Levels in VVI and DDD Pacing with Different AV Delays During Daily Activity and ExercisePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Assessment of the optimal atrio-ventricular delay in DDD paced patients by impedance plethysmographyEuropean Heart Journal, 1989
- Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler.Heart, 1989
- Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Noninvasive assessment of pacemaker hemodynamics by doppler echocardiography: Importance of left atrial sizeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- A comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ventricular and sequential A-V pacing in patients with heart blockAmerican Heart Journal, 1969