Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 34 (2) , 105-117
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6
Abstract
This study examined whether a cognitive interview (CI) can counteract the effects of suggestive interviews involving forced fabrication. College students witnessed a filmed event and were later forced to fabricate answers to misleading questions about the event. All witnesses were interviewed with a non-leading CI or free recall (FR) either before or after the forced fabrication phase. A week later participants completed a recognition and source monitoring (SM) test of video content. Relative to FR, the CI administered before the forced fabrication interview increased reports of correct details and reduced false assents to fabricated items. A CI after resulted in false memory rates comparable to the FR group. Early interviews using CI techniques may protect against memory loss and misinformation effects.Keywords
Funding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool.Law and Human Behavior, 2009
- Inventing stories: Forcing witnesses to fabricate entire fictitious events leads to freely reported false memoriesPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2008
- Interviewer feedback in repeated interviews involving forced confabulationApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2007
- The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent informationPsychology, Crime & Law, 2006
- Increasing False Recognition Rates with Confirmatory Feedback: A Phenomenological AnalysisThe American Journal of Psychology, 2003
- Intended and unintended effects of explicit warnings on eyewitness suggestibility: Evidence from source identification testsMemory & Cognition, 2001
- Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children's mundane and fantastic claims.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigmPsychology, Crime & Law, 1999
- Memorial consequences of forced confabulation: Age differences in susceptibility to false memories.Developmental Psychology, 1998
- Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility in children's recall.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997