Electrocardiographic Effects of Fluoxetine and Doxepin in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 17 (1) , 15-21
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004714-199702000-00004
Abstract
Cardiovascular adverse effects are amongst the most serious observed with antidepressant drugs and are often due to effects on cardiac conduction and refractoriness. However, such electrophysiologic effects may not be evident when using conventional electrocardiographic measures. Forty patients with major depressive disorder (according to DSM-III-R criteria) were enrolled in a 6-week double-blind parallel group study of fluoxetine (N = 20) or doxepin (N = 20). Cardiac conduction (QRS duration) and repolarization (corrected QT interval, QTc), were measured using signal-averaged electrocardiograms and 12-lead electrocardiogram at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment. Patients taking doxepin (mean daily dosage at 6 weeks 169 +/- 42 mg) were similar to those taking fluoxetine (37 +/- 18 mg) for demographic variables and improvement in depression scores but volunteered more side effects (p = 0.011), especially dry mouth (p < 0.001) and dizziness/lightheadedness (p = 0.005). After 6 weeks, doxepin increased heart rate (69 +/- 12 to 81 +/- 13 beats per minute; p = 0.0003) and prolonged QTc (from 417 +/- 36 to 439 +/- 28 msec; p < 0.03); overall QRS duration was not prolonged but was correlated with serum doxepin concentrations (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). Fluoxetine had no effect on QTc (428 +/- 24 msec at baseline vs. 430 +/- 24 msec at 6 weeks) or QRS duration (97 +/- 12 msec at baseline vs. 94 +/- 12 msec at 6 weeks). The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram showed no significant change in QRS or QTc for either drug. Using a sensitive measure of electrocardiographic effects, doxepin prolongs repolarization and may slow cardiac conduction. Fluoxetine has no measurable electrocardiographic effects, which suggests an increased safety margin for cardiac adverse effects. The ability of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram to resolve small changes in the electrocardiogram is useful in the assessment of drugs with subtle electrophysiologic effects.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- FluoxetineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Comparative Tolerability Profiles of the Newer versus Older AntidepressantsDrug Safety, 1994
- Effects of sotalol on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia: Relation to suppression of inducibility and changes in tachycardia cycle lengthJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Selective prolongation of QRS late potentials by sodium channel blocking antiarrhythmic drugs: Relation to slowing of ventricular tachycardiaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Cardiovascular effects of paroxetinePsychopharmacology, 1990
- Tricyclic Antidepressants in Depressed Patients With Cardiac Conduction DiseaseArchives of General Psychiatry, 1987
- Review of clinical and animal studies comparing the cardiovascular effects of doxepin and other tricyclic antidepressantsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1983
- Cardiotoxicity of amitriptyline and doxepinClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1981
- The Clinical Evaluation Doxepin — A New Psychotherapeutic AgentPsychosomatics, 1969
- A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1960