The efficacy of issue and character attack message strategies in political campaign communication
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Reports
- Vol. 2 (2) , 53-61
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08934218909367484
Abstract
This study examined comparative attack message strategies in political campaign communication. A total of 733 interviews were completed among potential voters in the U. S. Senate campaign during October 1986. The study hypothesized that, among people already committed to the opposing candidate, character attack messages exert more influence than issue attack messages. This prediction was not supported. Instead, the results indicated that, during the latter stages of a political campaign featuring known candidates, issue attack messages exert more change in attitudes and vote intention than character attack messages. Possible reasons for this finding are explored.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of negative political advertising: The roles of sponsor and rebuttalJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1985
- A revisionist perspective on political ad hominem argument: A case studyCentral States Speech Journal, 1984
- ISSUE VERSUS IMAGE ORIENTATION AND EFFECTS OF POLITICAL ADVERTISINGCommunication Research, 1983
- Issue Preferences and Candidate Choice in Presidential PrimariesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1982
- Voter Choice in the 1974 Congressional ElectionsAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1980
- Political Imagery and Information in an Age of TelevisionJournalism Quarterly, 1978
- AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF A MODEL OF RESISTANCE TO PERSUASIONHuman Communication Research, 1978
- THE ROLE OF THE PRESS IN DETERMINING VOTER REACTIONS TO PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES1Human Communication Research, 1978
- Radio vs. TV: The Effect of the MediumJournal of Communication, 1976
- An Index to Measure Contingency of English SentencesLanguage and Speech, 1961