A proposal for the subdivision of tertiary time in New Zealand
- 1 June 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics
- Vol. 13 (2) , 350-363
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1970.10423972
Abstract
It is suggested that homotaxial biostratigraphic units are an unsuitable basis for the definition of a New Zealand Tertiary geological time scale. Three other possible ways of setting up a time scale are discussed, and it is concluded that stratigraphic marker pegs offer the best basis for a rigorously defined time scale. In order to avoid the disadvantages of a hierarchical system of naming it is further suggested that the primary names in a time scale be attached to the pegs, and not to the intervals between them. Possible objections to the use of named marker pegs as the basis for a time scale are discussed in some detail. An appendix contains points for further discussion, and some specific recommendations on the implementation of a stratigraphic marker peg scheme for New Zealand Tertiary events.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hierarchy in Stratigraphical NomenclatureGeological Magazine, 1968
- A Use of Reference-Points in StratigraphyGeological Magazine, 1967
- Time in stratigraphyNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1966
- Description of an experimental class within the Globigerinidae (foraminifera)—1New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1966
- The unity of stratigraphyNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1966
- Geological divisions of timeNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1966
- A viewpoint on stages and zonesNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1965
- Homotaxial stratigraphyNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1965
- The type locality concept in time-stratigraphyNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1960
- Stratigraphic terminologyGSA Bulletin, 1941