Multiple Orientations for the Conduct of Marketing Research: An Analysis of the Academic/Practitioner Distinction
Open Access
- 1 October 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing
- Vol. 50 (4) , 161-173
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298605000403
Abstract
A distinction often is made in marketing between academic and practitioner-oriented research. That distinction has been used to justify one type of research by highlighting the limitations of the other. The authors use a validity network schema developed by Brinberg and McGrath to characterize academic and practitioner orientations in research. Three extended examples (research using the Fishbein theory of reasoned action, causal modeling, and consumer satisfaction/complaining behavior) illustrate the use of both academic and practitioner orientations. The authors argue that both are necessary for understanding marketing problems.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management Science and Marketing ManagementJournal of Marketing, 1985
- Furthering the Applied Side of SociologyAmerican Sociological Review, 1984
- The Role of External Validity in Theoretical ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 1983
- The Concept of External ValidityJournal of Consumer Research, 1982
- On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 1982
- RESEARCH IN THE “REAL WORLD”—A CONCEPTUAL MODEL1Personnel Psychology, 1980
- Separating Perceptual Dimensions from Affective Overtones: An Application to Consumer AestheticsJournal of Consumer Research, 1979
- Paradigm Development in the Social Sciences: A Proposed Research StrategyAcademy of Management Review, 1978
- An Experimental Investigation of Causal Relations among Cognitions, Affect, and Behavioral IntentionJournal of Consumer Research, 1977
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959