The Age Factor in the Prediction of Tertary Academic Success
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research & Development
- Vol. 3 (1) , 61-70
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436840030105
Abstract
This study examined the predictive power of age in the academic performance of Behavioural Science students at the Darling Downs Institute of Advanced Education. Other predictor variables included were study methods, Tertiary Entrance score, personal problems, satisfaction with college, self‐concept, locus of control and flexibility of thinking. 79 students, 93% of the total population, responded to the questionnaire containing scales measuring the above variables. Results from multiple regression analyses showed that the contribution of age outweighed by far that of any other variable. The next best predictors were study methods and environment factors. The contribution of personality traits and T.E. score was minimal. A high correlation between age and study methods was also noted. A greater acceptance of older age students into Behavioural Science courses was suggested.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mature age unmatriculated students and the justification of a more liberal admissions policyHigher Education, 1980
- Prediction of University Success: A Follow-up Study of the 1977 Internal Intake to the University of New EnglandAustralian Journal of Education, 1979
- DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS OF STUDY STRATEGIES CONNECTED WITH COLLEGE GRADE SUCCESS IN DIFFERENT MAJOR FIELDSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1973
- THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTSBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
- Personality correlates of certain dimensions of study behaviourAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1970
- Faculty patterns in study behaviourAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1970
- THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PERSONALITY, STUDY METHODS AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCEBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970
- Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966