Modification of pain on injection of propofol
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 51 (4) , 394-395
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07756.x
Abstract
One hundred and fifty ASA 1 and 2 patients were randomly allocated to receive pethidine 25 mg (1 ml), lignocaine 10 mg (1 ml) or 0.9% saline (1 ml) on a double-blind basis, as pretreatment to reduce pain on injection of propofol. Both active treatments were significantly better than placebo at preventing pain (p < 0.01). Lignocaine was most effective in preventing pain in men (p < 0.05) whilst pethidine was more effective in women (p < 0.05).Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pretreatment with alfentanil reduces pain caused by propofolBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1994
- PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL: COMPARISON OF LIGNOCAINE WITH METOCLOPRAMIDEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
- Lidocaine for the Prevention of Pain Due to Injection of PropofolAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992
- Effect of prior administration of cold saline on pain during propofol injectionAnaesthesia, 1991
- PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL: EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATION AND DILUENTBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1991
- Modification of pain on injection of propofol—a comparison between lignocaine and procaineAnaesthesia, 1991
- Comparison of intrathecal meperidine and lidocaine in endoscopic urological proceduresCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1990
- Effects of Alfentanil on Induction and Recovery from Propofol Anaesthesia in Day SurgeryAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1990
- Propofol: clinical strategies for preventing the pain of injectionAnaesthesia, 1988
- Spinal anaesthesia with meperidine as the sole agentCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1985