Drug Analyses in Poisoned Patients—The Need to Be Specific
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
- Vol. 19 (4) , 254-257
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000456328201900413
Abstract
Methods for the qualitative determination of drugs in blood and urine which have been used over the past 20 years have on several occasions given rise to incorrect interpretation due to their lack of specificity, which has resulted in falsely high values being reported for commonly requested drugs. Modern methods provide an opportunity to ensure specificity in the future but analysts must continue to be aware of the potential pitfalls. Examples of non-specificity in colorimetric, UV spectrophotometric, and immunological techniques are described and the clinical implications are demonstrated.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid Determination of Plasma ParacetamolAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 1976
- Glutethimide PoisoningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- Acute poisoning: some myths and misconceptions.BMJ, 1971
- Acute liver necrosis following overdose of paracetamol.BMJ, 1966
- Limited Usefulness of Alkaline Diuresis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Pentobarbital IntoxicationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1965
- FORCED DIURESIS AND HÆMODIALYSIS IN BARBITURATE INTOXICATIONThe Lancet, 1965
- FORCED DIURESIS AND HÆMODIALYSIS IN SEVERE BARBITURATE INTOXICATIONThe Lancet, 1964
- A SIMPLE TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF CHLORPROMAZINE IN URINEAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1957
- Rapid determination of salicylate in biological fluidsBiochemical Journal, 1954
- Determination of BarbituratesAnalytical Chemistry, 1952