Assessing the Clinical Importance of Statistically Significant Improvement in Anti-Dementia Drug Trials
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Neuroepidemiology
- Vol. 20 (2) , 51-56
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000054761
Abstract
A strategy for assessing the clinical importance of statistically significant treatment benefits in recent dementia drug trials is proposed. Traditional criteria for the assessment of valid inferences are helpful: the more likely the treatment effects are valid, the greater the chance that they will be clinically important. The role of the Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change is also of some importance. Progress in this area faces the special challenge that the ‘new’ disease entity of partial treatment of Alzheimer’s disease has not been well described. Large, systematic clinical studies of treated patients remain necessary to define reliable guides to successful treatment.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Alzheimer's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- What Are Surrogate Outcome Measures and Why Do They Fail in Clinical Research?Neuroepidemiology, 1999
- The Effects of Donepezil in Alzheimer’s Disease – Results from a Multinational Trial1Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 1999
- Liver transplantation in a Jehovah's witnessThe Lancet, 1999
- Perils and Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Clinical Trials: A Reflection on the Recent Experience in Multiple SclerosisNeuroepidemiology, 1999
- Hiva OaThe Lancet, 1999
- A taxonomy for goal setting in the care of persons with dementiaJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Donepezil Improves Cognition and Global Function in Alzheimer DiseaseA 15-Week, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled StudyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1998
- A Controlled Trial of Selegiline, Alpha-Tocopherol, or Both as Treatment for Alzheimer's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995