Making Observational Studies Count
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 22 (3) , 295-297
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3182126569
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment in Human Influenza A(H5N1) Infections: Analysis of a Global Patient RegistryThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Why Observational Studies Should Be Among The Tools Used In Comparative Effectiveness ResearchHealth Affairs, 2010
- A Vision of Accessible EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 2010
- Preregistration of Study Protocols Is Unlikely to Improve the Yield From Our Science, But Other Strategies MightEpidemiology, 2010
- Preregistration of Epidemiologic StudiesEpidemiology, 2010
- Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Approaches to Mitigate Bias and Confounding in the Design of Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part IIValue in Health, 2009
- Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Analytic Methods to Improve Causal Inference from Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part IIIValue in Health, 2009
- Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part IValue in Health, 2009
- STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Some Guidelines on GuidelinesEpidemiology, 2007