Preregistration of Study Protocols Is Unlikely to Improve the Yield From Our Science, But Other Strategies Might
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- proposal to-register-observational-studies
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 21 (5) , 612-613
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181e9bba6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Registration of observational studiesBMJ, 2010
- Should protocols for observational research be registered?The Lancet, 2010
- Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publicationsBMJ, 2009
- Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and JournalsJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006
- How useful are unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration in meta-analysis?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- False positive outcomes and design characteristics in occupational cancer epidemiology studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Commentary: Prior specification of hypotheses: cause or just a correlate of informative studies?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- What You Should Have Learned about Epidemiologic Data AnalysisEpidemiology, 1999
- Data trawling: to fish or not to fishThe Lancet, 1996
- The Hypothesis Generating MachineEpidemiology, 1993