Pesticide Exposure during Greenhouse Applications, Part II. Chemical Permeation Through Protective Clothing in Contact with Treated Foliage
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Vol. 9 (8) , 567-574
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322x.1994.10388372
Abstract
Protective clothing performance during greenhouse high pressure handspray applications was evaluated with particular reference to the hazard of contact with wet or treated foliage. A fluorescent compound was added to the applicator's spray tank prior to work and served as a surrogate for the pesticides being sprayed. Video-imaging analysis was conducted to determine deposition patterns of the fluorescent tracer on skin, and a modified patch technique was employed outside and inside the protective garment. Four garments constructed of nonwoven, chemical-resistant fabric were tested in an initial study (TyvekTM, Saranex 23-P TyvekTM, ComfortgardTM II, KleenguardTM). All garments exhibited chemical breakthrough after a 1-hour application period. Garments with special treatments to enhance chemical resistance exhibited relatively low levels of breakthrough, whereas garments without such treatment allowed substantial breakthrough. These results prompted an additional study aimed at determining the breakthrough time for the untreated garments (Tyvek, Kleenguard). Breakthrough for both garments occurred between 5 and 15 minutes following the start of application. This study also indicated that results from patch sampling can be misleading if care is not taken in the specific placement of the patches on subjects. It was concluded that none of the garments can be considered chemical resistant under the use conditions observed. Contact with treated foliage represents a special hazard during greenhouse applications, and many chemical protective clothing products in current use are inadequate for worker protection. These products should be redesigned and field-tested to ensure that greenhouse workers do not contact pesticides by this exposure pathway.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indoor application of anti-cholinesterase agents and the influence of personal protection on uptakeArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1992
- Protection afforded citrus pesticide applicators by coverallsArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1990
- Nonuniform dermal deposition patterns during occupational exposure to pesticidesArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1990
- Pesticide exposure to greenhouse handgunnersArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1989
- Comparative Assessment of Protective Clothing Performance by Measurement of Dermal Exposure during Pesticide ApplicationsApplied Industrial Hygiene, 1988
- Development and Validation of a Laboratory Spray System Designed to Contaminate Fabrics with Pesticide SolutionsPublished by ASTM International ,1988
- Dicofol exposure to Florida citrus applicators: Effects of protective clothingArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1986
- Data-Base Proposal for Use in Predicting Mixer-Loader-Applicator ExposurePublished by American Chemical Society (ACS) ,1985
- Evaluation of various clothing materials for protection and worker acceptability during application of pesticidesArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1982
- Correlation of urinary pesticide metabolite excretion with estimated dermal contact in the course of occupational exposure to guthionJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1981