Concealment of Negative Organizational Outcomes: An Agency Theory Perspective
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 37 (5) , 1302-1334
- https://doi.org/10.5465/256674
Abstract
To explore if, when, and how intentionally corporate officers conceal negative organizational outcomes from shareholders, we used computer-assisted content analysis of over 1,000 president's letters contained in annual reports to shareholders. Results suggest that outside directors, large institutional investors, and accountants limit such concealment, but small institutional investors and outside directors who are shareholders prompt it. Low disclosure is associated with subsequent selling of stock by top officers and outside directors. This result supports the claim that concealment by officers and its toleration by outside directors may be intentional.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSIONAcademy of Management Review, 1993
- Power and Managerial Dismissal: Scapegoating at the TopAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1992
- The Double-Edge of Organizational LegitimationOrganization Science, 1990
- Agency research in managerial accounting: A second lookAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1990
- Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal, 1989
- Optimal Contracts with a Utility-Maximizing AuditorJournal of Accounting Research, 1987
- THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURES OF DIVISIONALIZATION DECISIONS [1]Journal of Management Studies, 1985
- Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual ReportsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Power, Performance, and Succession in the Large CorporationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1982
- The Auditor As an Economic AgentJournal of Accounting Research, 1982