Antimycotic Therapy with Liposomal Amphotericin-B for Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leukemia & Lymphoma
- Vol. 24 (5-6) , 491-499
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10428199709055586
Abstract
Suspected deep or systemic mycosis in patients undergoing high-dose therapy and autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) requires an immediate systemic antimycotic therapy. Intravenous therapy with the standard drug conventional amphotericin-B is associated with severe adverse effects like nephrotoxicity and chills. Furthermore, BMT patients often receive other potential nephrotoxic drugs such as CsA or virustatics. In this study, we report 74 BMT-patients treated with liposomal amphotericin-B for culture-documented aspergillosis (n = 5) or candidiasis (n = 6), or for serologically (n = 35) or clinically suspected mycosis or as prophylaxis (n = 2). Therapy was initiated with a median dose of 2.8 (0.64–5.09) mg/kg body-weight and continued for 13 (1-55) days. The drug was excellently tolerated and only in one was therapy stopped due to severe chills and fever. Severe organ impairment was not obserded under therapy with liposomal amphotericin-B. Creatinine decreased in five patients after an increase under preceding therapy with the conventional formulation. Influence of liposomal amphotericin-B on bilirubin and transaminases was difficult to evaluate due to therapy-related toxicity, veno-occlusive disease (VOD), and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). 10/11 culture-positive patients died from aspergillosis (5/5) or candidiasis (5/6), but in 9/11 of these subjects the immunity was additionally compromised by GvHD, steroid therapy, and VOD. Liposomal amphotericin-B was effective in preventing relapse of systemic mycosis in 10/12 patients with a history of aspergillosis (n = 11) or candidiasis (n = 1). We conclude, that favourable toxicity of liposomal amphotericin-B should encourage dose escalation studies of liposomal amphotericin-B randomised against the conventional formulation and that the comparison of patients undergoing BMT with patients under standard chemotherapy might be difficult because of additional risk factors of the BMT-patients.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tolerance of high doses of amphotericin B by infusion of a liposomal formulation in children with cancerAnnals of Hematology, 1994
- Efficacy and tolerance of an amphotericm B lipid (Intralipid) emulsion in the treatment of candidaemia in neutropenic patientsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1993
- Current Role of Therapy with Amphotericin BClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Comparison of the in vitro antifungal activity of free and liposome-encapsulated amphotericin BEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Empiric Therapy with Amphotericin B in Febrile Granulocytopenic PatientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Successful treatment of cryptococcal meningitis with liposomal amphotericin B after failure of treatment with fluconazole and conventional amphotericin BAIDS, 1991
- Graft-Versus-Host DiseaseHematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, 1990
- In vitro antifungal activities of amphotericin B and liposome-encapsulated amphotericin BAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1984
- Nephrotoxic effects of amphotericin B, including renal tubular acidosisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1969
- Nephrotoxicity of Amphotericin BAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1964