Comparison of Side‐On and End‐On Coordination of E2 Ligands in Complexes [W(CO)5E2] (E=N, P, As, Sb, Bi, Si−, Ge−, Sn−, Pb−)
- 28 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Chemistry – A European Journal
- Vol. 9 (15) , 3518-3529
- https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200304723
Abstract
Complexes of W(CO)5 with neutral diatomic pnictogen ligands N2, P2, As2, Sb2, and Bi2 and anionic Group 14 ligands Si22−, Ge22−, Sn22−, and Pb22− coordinated in both side-on and end-on fashion have been optimized by using density functional theory at the BP86 level with valence sets of TZP quality. The calculated bond energies have been used to compare the preferential binding modes of each respective ligand. The results were interpreted by analyzing the nature of the interaction between the ligands and the metal fragment using an energy partitioning method. This yields quantitative information regarding the strength of covalent and electrostatic interactions between the metal and ligand, as well as the contributions by orbitals of different symmetry to the covalent bonding. Results show that all the ligands studied bind preferentially in a side-on coordination mode, with the exception of N2, which prefers to coordinate in an end-on mode. The preference of the heavier homologues P2–Bi2 for binding in a side-on mode over the end-on mode in the neutral complexes [(CO)5WE2] comes mainly from the much stronger electrostatic attraction in the former species. The energy difference between the side-on and end-on isomers of the negatively charged complexes with the ligands Si22−, Ge22−, Sn22−, and Pb22− is much less and it cannot be ascribed to a particular bonding component.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Roothaan-Hartree-Fock-Slater atomic wave functions: Single-zeta, double-zeta, and extended Slater-type basis sets for 87Fr-103LrPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Stability and Bonding Situation of Electron-Deficient Transition-Metal Complexes. Theoretical Study of the CO-Labilizing Effect of Ligands L in [W(CO)5L] (L = C2H2, NCH, N2, C2H4, OH2, SH2, NH3, F-, Cl-, OH-, SH-) and [W(CO)4L]2- (L2- = O2C2H22-, S2C2H22-) and the Structure of the 16-Valence-Electron Complexes [W(CO)4L] and [W(CO)3L]2- †Organometallics, 2001
- Energy Analysis of Metal-Ligand Bonding in Transition Metal Complexes with Terminal Group-13 Diyl Ligands (CO)4Fe-ER, Fe(EMe)5and Ni(EMe)4(E = B−Tl; R = Cp, N(SiH3)2, Ph, Me) Reveals Significant π Bonding in Homoleptical MoleculesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2001
- Pb22− as Ligand in [Ph4P]2[{W(CO)5}4Pb2]Published by Wiley ,2000
- Pb22− als Ligand in [Ph4P]2[{W(CO)5}4Pb2]Angewandte Chemie, 2000
- Comparison of local-density and Hartree–Fock calculations of molecular polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilitiesThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1993
- Organosamarium-mediated synthesis of bismuth-bismuth bonds: x-ray crystal structure of the first dibismuth complex containing a planar M2(.mu.-.eta.2:.eta.2-Bi2) unitJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1991
- Chemical properties from the promoleculeThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1986
- Structural characterization of Co2(CO)5[P(C6H5)3](.mu.-P2): a tricyclic complex containing a bridging P2 ligandInorganic Chemistry, 1979
- Molekülstruktur eines π‐Distickstoff‐Nickel‐Lithium‐KomplexesAngewandte Chemie, 1973