The Use of Different Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Brands in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Densitometry
- Vol. 2 (1) , 37-44
- https://doi.org/10.1385/jcd:2:1:37
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: Comparison of visual examination and process-control chartsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996
- A multicenter comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers: In vivo and in vitro measurements of bone mineral content and densityJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996
- Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studiesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995
- Dual X-ray absorptiometry—cross-calibration and normative reference ranges for the spine: Results of a European Community Concerted ActionBone, 1995
- Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniquesOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipmentJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration resultsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- Precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: Development of quality control rules and their application in longitudinal studiesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1993
- Bone mass measurement by DXA: Influence of analysis procedures and interunit variationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992
- Effect of Fluoride Treatment on the Fracture Rate in Postmenopausal Women with OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990