Research in Activity:
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Written Communication
- Vol. 22 (2) , 127-165
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088305274781
Abstract
This article traces the historical and conceptual development of what is known as activity theory, from Vygotsky and Luria, to A. N. Leont’ev, to Engeström, in order to illustrate what I see as two problems with the activity theoretic approach, especially as manifest in the work of Leont’ev and Engeström: what I call the boundary and/or focus problem and the unit-of-analysis problem. In the second half of the article, I explore the social semiotic of an everyday artifact, the “speed bump,” and introduce a discovery heuristic for examining how this artifact functions mediationally in human activity. In so doing, I have tried to discover activity through principled analysis, rather than assuming activity or activity system a priori.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tasks, Ensembles, and ActivityWritten Communication, 2003
- On the relationship between old and new technologiesComputers and Composition, 1999
- Out of the Laboratory and Down to the BayWritten Communication, 1996
- Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practicePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- The acquisition of a child by a learning disabilityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Re-searching psychotherapeutic practicePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Context, Text, IntertextWritten Communication, 1992
- Does the Medium Make a Difference? Two Studies of Writing With Pen and Paper and With ComputersHuman–Computer Interaction, 1989
- The Productive Career of Aleksei Nikolaevich Leont'evSoviet Psychology, 1984