Comparison of Long-Term (Seven Year) Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization With Versus Without Stenting
- 27 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 97 (10) , 1467-1472
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.036
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Stent Placement in Native Coronary ArteriesCirculation, 2002
- Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Stenting With Balloon Angioplasty in Small Vessels in Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery DiseaseCirculation, 2000
- Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Outcomes at 1 year and economic implications of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in patients undergoing coronary stenting: results from a multicentre randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS)Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)The Lancet, 1998
- Long-Term (4- to 6-Year) Outcome of Palmaz-Schatz Stenting: Paucity of Late Clinical Stent-Related ProblemsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty.Circulation, 1994
- Outcome in medically treated coronary artery disease. Ischemic events: nonfatal infarction and death.Circulation, 1980