Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Stent Placement in Native Coronary Arteries
- 25 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 105 (25) , 2986-2991
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000019743.11941.3b
Abstract
Background — Although coronary stents have been proved effective in reducing clinical cardiac events for up to 3 to 5 years, longer term clinical and angiographic outcomes have not yet been fully clarified. Methods and Results — To evaluate longer term (7 to 11 years) outcome, clinical and angiographic follow-up information was analyzed in 405 patients with successful stenting in native coronary arteries. Primary or secondary stabilization, which was defined as freedom from death, coronary artery bypass grafting, and target lesion-percutaneous coronary intervention (TL-PCI) during the 14 months after the initial procedure or after the last TL-PCI, was achieved in 373 patients (92%) overall. Only 7 patients (1.7%) underwent TL-PCI more than twice. After the initial 14-month period, freedom from TL-PCI reached a plateau at 84.9% to 80.7% over 1 to 8 years. However, quantitative angiographic analysis in 179 lesions revealed a triphasic luminal response characterized by an early restenosis phase until 6 months, an intermediate-term regression phase from 6 months to 3 years, and a late renarrowing phase beyond 4 years. Minimal luminal diameter in 131 patients with complete serial data were 2.62±0.4 mm immediately after stenting, 2.0±0.49 mm at 6 months, 2.19±0.49 mm at 3 years, and 1.85±0.56 mm beyond 4 years ( P Conclusions — The efficacy and safety of coronary stenting seemed to be clinically sustained at 7 to 11 years of follow-up. However, late luminal renarrowing beyond 4 years was common, which demonstrates the need for further follow-up.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term (≥8 years) outcome after palmaz-schatz stent implantationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Clinical and sequential angiographic follow-up six months and 10 years after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- A Clinical Trial Comparing Three Antithrombotic-Drug Regimens after Coronary-Artery StentingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Long-Term (4- to 6-Year) Outcome of Palmaz-Schatz Stenting: Paucity of Late Clinical Stent-Related ProblemsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stentingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Three-Year Follow-up after Implantation of Metallic Coronary-Artery StentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Serial angiographic follow-up after palmaz-schatz stent implantation: Comparison with conventional balloon angioplastyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: Immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experienceJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Pathologic observations in 20 patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991