Effects of interfacial atomic segregation and intermixing on the electronic properties of InAs/GaSb superlattices
- 22 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review B
- Vol. 65 (16) , 165302
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.65.165302
Abstract
Abrupt InAs/GaSb superlattices have In-Sb and Ga-As interfacial chemical bonds that are not present in the constituent materials InAs and GaSb. We study the effect of interfacial atomic mixing on the electronic structure of such superlattices, including electron and hole energies and wave function localization, interband transition energies, and dipole matrix elements. We combine an empirical pseudopotential method for describing the electronic structure with two different structural models of interfacial disorder. First, we use the “single-layer disorder” model and change in a continous way the composition of the interfacial bonds. Second, we study interfacial atomic segregation using a layer-by-layer kinetic model of molecular beam epitaxy growth, fit to the observed scanning tunneling microscopy segregation profiles. The growth model provides a detailed structural model of segregated InAs/GaSb superlattices with atomic resolution. The application of the empirical pseudopotential method to such structures reveals remarkable electronic consequences of segregation, among them a large blueshift of the band gap. This result explains the surprising gap increase with growth temperature observed for similar structures. In particular we find that (i) superlattices with only In-Sb interfacial bonds have lower band gaps (by 50 meV) than superlattices with only Ga-As interfacial bonds. (ii) Heavy-hole–to–electron transition energies increase with the number of Ga-As interfacial bonds more than light-hole–to–electron transition energies. (iii) The heavy-hole wave functions show a strong localization on the In-Sb interfacial bonds. The heavy-hole wave functions have very different amplitudes on the Ga-As interface and on the In-Sb interface. (iv) Sb segregates at InAs-on-GaSb growth, whereas As and In segregate at GaSb-on-InAs growth, but Ga does not segregate. (v) The segregation of Sb and In induces a blueshift in the band gap. (vi) There is an in-plane polarization anisotropy due to the low symmetry of the no-common-atom InAs/GaSb superlattice. This anisotropy is reduced by interfacial segregation.
Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- In-plane anisotropy of the optical properties of superlatticesPhysical Review B, 2001
- Origin of Antimony Segregation inStrained-Layer SuperlatticesPhysical Review Letters, 2000
- Anticrossing and coupling of light-hole and heavy-hole states in (001)heterostructuresPhysical Review B, 2000
- Visualizing Interfacial Structure at Non-Common-Atom Heterojunctions with Cross-Sectional Scanning Tunneling MicroscopyPhysical Review Letters, 2000
- Anticrossing semiconducting band gap in nominally semimetallic InAs/GaSb superlatticesPhysical Review B, 2000
- Multiband coupling and electronic structure ofsuperlatticesPhysical Review B, 1999
- Role of symmetry reduction in the polarization dependence of the optical absorption in non-common-atom superlatticesPhysical Review B, 1998
- Giant Optical Anisotropy of Semiconductor Heterostructures with No Common Atom and the Quantum-Confined Pockels EffectPhysical Review Letters, 1996
- Calculating the optical properties of multidimensional heterostructures: Application to the modeling of quaternary quantum well lasersIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1993
- Interfacial atomic structure and band offsets at semiconductor heterojunctionsJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 1992