Routine intravascular ultrasound scanning guidance of coronary stenting is not associated with improved clinical outcomes
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 148 (3) , 501-506
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.033
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Final Results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) StudyCirculation, 2000
- The PRESTO (Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes) protocol: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2000
- Reference Chart Derived From Post–Stent-Implantation Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of 6-Month Expected Restenosis on Quantitative Coronary AngiographyCirculation, 1999
- Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis in Lesions Treated With Palmaz-Schatz StentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Comparison of Immediate and Intermediate-Term Results of Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography-Guided Palmaz-Schatz Stent Implantation in Matched LesionsCirculation, 1997
- Original studies: Comparison of angiography and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of lumen size after coronary stent placement: Impact of dilation pressuresCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1997
- Vessel tearing at the edge of intracoronary stents detected with intravascular ultrasound imagingCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1997
- Intracoronary Stenting Without Anticoagulation Accomplished With Intravascular Ultrasound GuidanceCirculation, 1995
- Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation.Circulation, 1994