Using transcriptome profiling to characterize QTL regions on chicken chromosome 5
Open Access
- 2 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 10 (1) , 575
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-575
Abstract
Background Although many QTL for various traits have been mapped in livestock, location confidence intervals remain wide that makes difficult the identification of causative mutations. The aim of this study was to test the contribution of microarray data to QTL detection in livestock species. Three different but complementary approaches are proposed to improve characterization of a chicken QTL region for abdominal fatness (AF) previously detected on chromosome 5 (GGA5). Results Hepatic transcriptome profiles for 45 offspring of a sire known to be heterozygous for the distal GGA5 AF QTL were obtained using a 20 K chicken oligochip. mRNA levels of 660 genes were correlated with the AF trait. The first approach was to dissect the AF phenotype by identifying animal subgroups according to their 660 transcript profiles. Linkage analysis using some of these subgroups revealed another QTL in the middle of GGA5 and increased the significance of the distal GGA5 AF QTL, thereby refining its localization. The second approach targeted the genes correlated with the AF trait and regulated by the GGA5 AF QTL region. Five of the 660 genes were considered as being controlled either by the AF QTL mutation itself or by a mutation close to it; one having a function related to lipid metabolism (HMGCS1). In addition, a QTL analysis with a multiple trait model combining this 5 gene-set and AF allowed us to refine the QTL region. The third approach was to use these 5 transcriptome profiles to predict the paternal Q versus q AF QTL mutation for each recombinant offspring and then refine the localization of the QTL from 31 cM (100 genes) at a most probable location confidence interval of 7 cM (12 genes) after determining the recombination breakpoints, an interval consistent with the reductions obtained by the two other approaches. Conclusion The results showed the feasibility and efficacy of the three strategies used, the first revealing a QTL undetected using the whole population, the second providing functional information about a QTL region through genes related to the trait and controlled by this region (HMGCS1), the third could drastically refine a QTL region.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic dissection of a major mouse obesity QTL (Carfhg2): integration of gene expression and causality modelingPhysiological Genomics, 2009
- Increased ADAM17 mRNA Expression and Activity Is Associated With Atherosclerosis Resistance in LDL-Receptor Deficient MiceArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2008
- From QTL to QTN identification in livestock – winning by points rather than knock‐out: a reviewAnimal Genetics, 2007
- ArrayExpress--a public database of microarray experiments and gene expression profilesNucleic Acids Research, 2006
- NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles--database and tools updateNucleic Acids Research, 2006
- A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheepNature Genetics, 2006
- Fatness QTL on chicken chromosome 5 and interaction with sexGenetics Selection Evolution, 2006
- An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and diseaseNature Genetics, 2005
- A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pigNature, 2003
- Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factorsNature Genetics, 2003