Regulation of Therapeutic Research is Compromising the Interests of Patients1
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine
- Vol. 21 (6) , 395-404
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00124363-200721060-00004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consent for research in hyperacute strokeBMJ, 2006
- Why do women consent to surgery, even when they do not want to? An interactionist and Bourdieusian analysisSocial Science & Medicine, 2005
- Rethinking Research EthicsAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2005
- Women's accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Research in emergency situations: with or without relatives consentEmergency Medicine Journal, 2004
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Research ethics committees – time for change?Clinical Medicine, 2002
- Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a “trial effect”Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- The effect of lorcainide on arrhythmias and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an example of publication biasInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on mortality after myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983