Authority Structures for Construction Project Management
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
- Vol. 109 (4) , 406-422
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1983)109:4(406)
Abstract
Many practitioners believe that how one organizes to support a major construction project will have a significant impact on the successful completion of the project. This paper provides a primer on authority structures. The basic corporate organizational forms are described and construction examples are given. The basic authority structures for project management are also described. These forms are the functional, pure project, and matrix. For each form, the advantages and disadvantages as they relate to the project manager's ability to support the project are cited. Nine factors that influence the choice of authority structure are discussed. The role of the project manager is described. His effectiveness as a manager is related to the organizational form, hierarchy within the organization, authority gap, management style, and the ability to resolve conflict. Six principles for developing a project organization and selecting a project manager are given.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Matrix Management May Meet Your Needs for the 80sIssues in Engineering: Journal of Professional Activities, 1980
- Evolution to a Matrix OrganizationAcademy of Management Review, 1979
- INFLUENCE SOURCE OF PROJECT AND FUNCTIONAL MANAGERS IN MATRIX ORGANIZATIONS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1978
- Influence Styles of Project Managers: Some Project Performance Correlates.The Academy of Management Journal, 1974
- Leadership Techniques in the Project Organization.The Academy of Management Journal, 1968