LONG-TERM REPRODUCIBILITY OF URODYNAMIC INVESTIGATIONS IN HEALTHY FERTILE FEMALES
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 114, 35-41
Abstract
The long term reproducibility of uroflowmetry, urethral pressure profilometry, cystometry and pressure-flow studies was evaluated in 10 healthy fertile female volunteers over a two year period. All parameters were unchanged, except for an increase in the detrusor pressure. The volume at first sensation, the maximal cystometric capacity and the maximum flow rate, had a coefficience of variation (CV) of 24%, 15% and 21% respectively. The compliance and the opening time however showed a considerably higher CV. Several parameters showed a larger intra individual standard variation (SD) than the interindividual SD, indicating that these parameters should be interpreted with great care. Repetition of the investigations showed in this small material a reduction in the standard error of the mean (sEM). Repeating the investigation reduces the number of patients needed in a clinical trial to obtain a statistically significant change. The study showed that urodynamic investigation is a reliable tool in evaluate of patients over a period of years.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- DOUBLE CYSTOMETRY IN THE UNINHIBITED NEUROGENIC BLADDERActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 2009
- URODYNAMIC INVESTIGATIONS IN HEALTHY FERTILE FEMALES DURING THE MENSTRUAL-CYCLE1988
- URODYNAMIC INVESTIGATIONS AND THEIR REPRODUCIBILITY IN HEALTHY POSTMENOPAUSAL FEMALES1988
- A critical reappraisal of cystometry in neurogenic bladder diseasesUrological Research, 1987
- Isometric Detrusor Pressure during Bladder Filling and its Dependency on Bladder Volume and Interruption to Flow in Control SubjectsJournal of Urology, 1984
- A Diagnostic Dilemma: When Urodynamic Findings Differ from the Clinical ImpressionJournal of Urology, 1983
- Compliance of the bladder: An attempt to establish normal valuesUrology, 1979
- Detrusor Hyperreflexia in Benign Infravesical Obstruction. A Cystometric StudyJournal of Urology, 1976