The Trouble with Learning Outcomes
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Active Learning in Higher Education
- Vol. 3 (3) , 220-233
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787402003003003
Abstract
Recent decades have seen an increasing stress on the need to monitor and manage educators, and hold them to account. This article argues that, while learning outcomes can be valuable if properly used, they have been misappropriated and adopted widely at all levels within the education system to facilitate the managerial process. This has led to their distortion. The claim that they can be made precise by being written with a prescribed vocabulary of special descriptors so as to serve as objective, measurable devices for monitoring performance, is fundamentally mistaken, and they may be damaging to education when used in this way. After a brief sketch of the background to the notion of learning outcomes, arguments are presented to show their vacuity and uselessness when misused in this way, and explanations of their inadequacies are offered.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Tyranny of TransparencyBritish Educational Research Journal, 2000
- Conceptions and Beliefs About “Good Teaching”: An integration of contrasting research areasHigher Education Research & Development, 2000
- The tyranny of lightFutures, 1997
- Planned and Emergent LearningManagement Learning, 1996
- Planned and Emergent LearningExecutive Development, 1994